Thank you Roger
I am not clear about the gnat issue ... is it that I have made a sexist remark about male gnats or that I have been generally discriminatory towards gnats?
On one hand I guess I should have clarified that gnats' private parts were used as a descriptive means of trying to relate the proximity of a Hurricane to Tobago.
Gnats would probably derive some considerable reassurance from the fact that their private parts are indeed quite large relative to their overall body mass ... the fact that gnats are very small creatures seemed to make it appropriate to refer to their private parts in preference to the private parts of other animals that are larger and would therefore undermine the point I was trying to get across.
Perhaps more consideration could have been given to other gnat body parts such as their arms or heads but I sense that this could have led to inaccuracies in my efforts to give a reasonable idea of the proximity of a Hurricane to Tobago

... private parts seemed to be the closest match and, accordingly, the most appropriate in this instance.
I fully accept that gnats may be quite sensitive to these issues and that other similar sized and less sensitive creatures could have been used for the purpose of the discussion but I sense that all Gnats will be proud to see that this topic has raised the profile of their species that has often been overlooked as a conduit for rational and objective discussion.
I trust that this clarifies the position.
Kind regards